There seems to be a wide range in the quality of the questions asked in this forum.
Maybe we can learn from other forums as to what has worked for them?
In that spirit I share these:
There seems to be a wide range in the quality of the questions asked in this forum.
Maybe we can learn from other forums as to what has worked for them?
In that spirit I share these:
awesome, this needs to me pinned down on every form.
thanks
Thanks @barryb . I think weād do well to start pushing for ābetter questionsā.
Having said that, whilst Iāve been occasionally tempted to refer people to the esr document, I donāt do it very often. Most of the document contains very good advice (it is definitely worth a read) but I find that its tone is a bit harsh. Being told in the Introduction that you may be regarded as a loser if you ask a suboptimal question means that Iām not happy to send someone who has just asked a suboptimal question to read it.
On the other hand I really like the first link you posted. Itās much more positive sounding, more concise and is full of examples that are really well aligned to how best to ask 96Boards related questions.